"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."

- Theodore Roosevelt

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."

- President John Quincy Adams

Hitler's Stealth Fighter

So did the Nazi's just "run out of time"? Or was it God's providence that prevented them from completing this jet before the Allies won?

Quote of the Day: Benjamin Franklin

Where liberty is, there is my country. - Benjamin Franklin

CA Congresswoman Says State Doesn't Have to "Live Within Their Means"

Incredible!!



"Well, there is this mantra out there ‘live within our means’, and while that sounds really nice, it sounds really simple, and it sounds really responsible, its meaningless. Our means are completely within our control. And, as has been pointed out by numerous people, we have just recently given away huge corporate subsidies in February, we have given away other tax reductions over many many years we’ve created new tax loopholes, in good times we routinely give away taxes, and then in lean times we never replace those tax deductions or close those loopholes. We continuously borrow, which is an enormous cost that we shift on into future years, and we find ourselves now with a deficit that — an ongoing structural deficit that we simply can’t close. So, ‘live within our means’ doesn’t mean anything." - CA Congresswoman Noreen Evans
- Full video can be seen here, if the state of CA gets their video site back up.

Update: Campaign for Liberty Worker Illegally Detained by TSA

I blogged about this a couple of months ago, now Steve Bierfeldt has filed suit against the TSA.

White House Refuses to Say Obama will Veto Healthcare Bill that Would Violate His Own Campaign Pledge

"Read my lips"??

Construction Worker Rescues Drowning Woman

Got to love the courage and humilty here.
The boat went over the dam shortly after 4 p.m. and the woman, who was also about 60, became caught in a boil just over the dam. She was wearing a life jacket and was partially clothed when she was pulled from the water by Jason Oglesbee, a construction worker for Cramer & Associates in Grimes.

"They just harnessed me up and dipped me down in the water and I grabbed her and the crane drug her to the boat and that's it," Oglesbee said. "What are you going to do if she's like that? It's no big deal. The whole crew did it."


Texas Governor Rick Perry Upholds Parental Rights

After a public uproar, Texas Governor Rick Perry rejected a bill that would have given Children's Protective Services unusual power.

After the Lone Star State's legislature passed the legislation as an amendment to another bill, the alarm was sounded and the public rose to the occasion. Jonathan Saenz of the Free Market Foundation led the campaign.

"I like to call it a seize-and-ask-questions-later CPS bill, which would have expanded Child Protective Services' rights to violate the constitutional rights of parents and children, and allow CPS to come to your home and take your kids and examine them and question them regarding an anonymous tip," he explains.

Saenz adds that under the bill, that could happen without a court hearing, without notice to the parents, without consent, and even without good cause -- in spite of a federal court decision that requires constitutional protections to stay in place.

"So, it's just ludicrous that now the legislature would try to do an end-run around what the federal court decided," Saenz concludes.

Governor Perry's office was flooded with phone calls and emails before the announcement was made that he would veto the measure.
- click here for the original article.

Reason # 432,124,432 to Home Educate My Children

Ben Stein on Cap and Trade - aka Tax and Cap

"Burning down the house!" and "It is really criminal."

and it's a "Ponzi scheme"

GA Congressman Tom Price Makes a Point on Cap and Trade Bill

I have to give it to Rep Price... this is great! He asked for a 'Moment of silence to recognize those who will lose their jobs because of this bill". Unfortunately it was objected to.

Historic Tax and Cap Bill Passes U.S. House

So much for our economic future!

It kills me that less than a year ago, most Republicans were pushing, shoving, and doing everything within their power to elect a man who believed in the Global Warming hoax and pushed his own "Cap and Trade" plan. He was also pretty proud that he "differed with Bush on Climate Change". But now all of the sudden Republicans are all against it? Come on guys! Time to get some soul and some guts fella's! Time to start sticking to principle rather than the party line. Time to stand up to those within our party who are Statist and Socialistic in their ideology and say - GET OUT!!! We do not want you in our party any longer! We are sick and tired of weak and cowardly leaders... we want some real leadership! Even if it means some people will disagree and balk at our stances. It's time to do what's right regardless of who goes along with us.

Sadly I do not believe that we have many leaders in Washington, or for that matter here in our state, who are willing to lay it all on the line and do what is right. And sadly I have very little sympathy for those of you who were not courageous enough to stand up to those in our own party who pushed for these same things. You get what you deserve. If we won't hold our leaders accountable, then we deserve exactly what they give us (I guess it's more appropriate to say "what they take from us").

House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill
WASHINGTON – In a triumph for President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed sweeping legislation Friday that calls for the nation's first limits on pollution linked to global warming and aims to usher in a new era of cleaner, yet more costly energy.

The vote was 219-212, capping months of negotiations and days of intense bargaining among Democrats. Republicans were overwhelmingly against the measure, arguing it would destroy jobs in the midst of a recession while burdening consumers with a new tax in the form of higher energy costs.
 - Click here for the full article.

House Filibuster?
Filibusters are not allowed in the House. They’re a province of the Senate. But House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) may have figured out a way to get around that prohibition Friday as the House inched closer to voting on a controversial energy and climate change bill.

Overnight, House Democrats tacked onto the bill a 300-page amendment. So when Boehner took his time to speak against the package at the end of the debate, the Ohio Republican then decided to peel through major portions of the bill and read them aloud before his House colleagues.

Historically, rank-and-file lawmakers are only given a few minutes to speak on the House floor. But the Speaker, Majority Leader and Minority Leader are given great latitude to speak when they approach the microphones.

After Boehner spoke for a few minutes, the leader donned a pair of reading glasses and began leafing through a gigantic, white binder. At that point, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) asked the chair if Boehner could do that.

“I know we have this magic minute that gives leaders a lot of extra time to speak. But I’m just wondering if there is some limit under the rules on the time that a leader may take, even though the time yielded was not 20 or 30 minutes?” Waxman asked.
- Click here for the full article

Boehner: America Has the Right to Know the Consequences of Pelosi's National Energy Tax

'Gangster Government'

It's a little old - but Rep. Michele Bachmann takes it hard to the left again.



Here's the Michael Barone article she referenced in her speech:

"The Chrysler negotiations will not be the last occasion for this administration to engage in bailout favoritism and crony capitalism. There’s a May 31 deadline to come up with a settlement for General Motors. And there will be others. In the meantime, who is going to buy bonds from unionized companies if the government is going to take their money away and give it to the union? We have just seen an episode of Gangster Government. It is likely to be part of a continuing series."
- click here for the full article

Top Five Reasons Not to Send Your Kids Back to Gov School - Voddie Baucham

Wow! Voddie Baucham has hit the nail on the head with this post. It's long... but a must read for everyone, parents and non-parents alike!

------------------------------------------------
Top Five Reasons Not to Send Your Kids Back to Govt. School

"Anyone who has kept up with my blog knows that I am no fan of government education. I have made it a point to carry The Continuing Collapse on a regular basis, and I try to make biblical, philosophical and theological arguments in favor of Christian education as often as possible. However, I recognize the obstacles those of us on my side of the street face. As many as eighty-five to ninety percent of professing Christians send their children to the government for their education. That is simply an astonishing figure considering the fact that the Christian community fought mandatory government education tooth-and-nail for it’s first fifty years of existence. Since then we have gone from fighting against government schools to fighting for them and implying that those who fight against them are fundamentalists, anti-intellectuals, and racists.

In the meantime, our schools grow progressively worse. Well, as we begin this summer, I want to appeal to those of you with children in government schools. Please don’t send them back! I beg you to consider what you are doing. As Dave Black has written:

No academic skepticism, no secularist authors, no blatant materialism can so undermine the spiritual life of the country like the completely secularized training of the child under the authority of the state... Bible-based education is mandatory for Christian parents. If we think we can keep our children in a secular school system and escape the dumbed-down, amoral, and immoral results of secular humanism in schools, we are sorely mistaken (emphasis added, see: http://daveblackonline.com/our.htm).
With that, here are the top five reasons not to send your kids back to government school next year:

5. YOU DON’T HAVE TO

This may sound like a no-brainer, but you’d be surprised how many people ask home educators the “authority” questions (i.e., to whom do your report? who approves your curriculum?). These questions are the byproduct of statism. The Gramscian, neo-Marxist influence is so prevalent in our culture that we don’t even recognize it anymore. We actually believe that children are wards of the state when in fact they are not. As a result, some people have a hard time believing that they have the right to educate their children in a manner of their choosing. Well, I’m here to tell you that you are free. Your children are yours. They do not belong to Caesar. You don’t have to take them back to the local government indoctrination center next semester. And in some states (thank God for Texas), you don’t even have to tell them you’re not coming back!

4. AMERICA’S SCHOOLS ARE AMONG THE WORST IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED WORLD

One of the issues that many Christians seem willing to ignore is the fact that sending children to American schools represents extremely poor stewardship. American students continually rank at the bottom in math, science and reading compared to other industrialized nations (see here). That’s right, our educational system is among the world’s worst! Of course everyone says, “Our schools are different.” News flash... that’s a lie!

One of our elders taught honors math at one of the “best schools” in one of the “best school districts” in Texas (you know, one of those schools people lie and cheat to get their children into so that they can get a better education). His advanced geometry class was filled with a bunch of imbeciles who could barely do basic arithmetic. As a result, most of them failed their first major test. You know what happened next. That’s right, the principal called him into the office and told him to make things right. One of the things he was told to employ was a grading technique called “Square root times ten.” Thus, a student who made a 49 on a test ended up with a 70 in the grade book (for those of you who went to government schools like me, that’s the square root of 49 times ten).

This is what’s happening at our “best” schools. Don’t believe me? ask a college admissions worker how many students coming from our “best” schools with grade point averages hovering near 4.0 need remediation when they get to college. It’s an absolute joke. The overwhelming majority of children in our schools have a B average or above (mostly for self esteem reasons), which serves to give them and their parents a false sense of achievement. It also results in people who ‘feel really good’ about their schools.

Please don’t buy the lie. Your child’s school is probably terrible. If you really care about the stewardship of you child’s mind, don’t send them back to the worst schools in the industrialized world next year.

3. AMERICA’S SCHOOLS ARE MORALLY REPUGNANT

The headlines speak for themselves. Student-teacher sex scandals, student-student sex, immodesty, foul language, drugs, alcohol, radical homosexual agendas, teachers taking students for abortions, “sexting” leading to suicide, sexually transmitted diseases, brutal beatings, and school shootings (see here). These are just some of the headlines that have become the norm. And that does not include things like cheating, disrespect for authority, impropriety towards the opposite sex, and other moral behaviors children learn regularly and repeatedly in school. Van Til said it better than I ever could:

“Non-Christian education puts the child in a vacuum…. The result is that child dies. Christian education alone really nurtures personality because it alone gives the child air and food…. Modern educational philosophy gruesomely insults our God and our Christ. How, then, do you expect to build anything positively Christian or theistic upon a foundation which is the negation of Christianity and theism?…. No teaching of any sort is possible except in Christian schools.”
Moreover, the system itself is funded by virtual theft. Homeowners are forced under threat of the loss of their property to pay for the education of other people’s children. How is that appropriate? The government tells everyone that they have to send their children to school, then tells homeowners that they are going to be the ones to foot the bill whether they like it or not. Not only is this a form of welfare, it is also a form of theft.

For those of you ready to read me the riot act and yell and scream about paying for roads and bridges, hold on a minute. Why is it that we get all up-in-arms about our tax dollars being used to fund abortions (while our opponents make the roads and bridges argument), but we don’t see this one? Our schools are morally repugnant. They are also neo-Marxist, secular humanist indoctrination centers. Why should I as a Christian be forced to pay for children to have every vestige of Christianity beaten out of them? Americans are not forced to pay for Mormon schools, or Muslim schools; why should we be forced to pay for neo-Marxist schools (remember, all education is religious in nature)? And why should any Christian contribute to such a system by sending their children to such schools at the expense of others? And before you yell, “I’m just using the tax dollars I spent,” ask yourself if you’re willing to take advantage of all that abortion funding going to Planned Parenthood, or those tax dollars going toward fetal stem cell research.

2.GOVERNMENT EDUCATION IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN

“I am as sure as I am of Christ’s reign that a comprehensive and centralized system of national education, separated from religion, as is now commonly proposed, will prove the most appalling enginery for the propagation of anti-Christian and atheistic unbelief, and of anti-social nihilistic ethics, individual, social and political, which this sin-rent world has ever seen.” - A.A. Hodge
Jesus made it quite clear when he said, “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.” (Matthew 12:30 ESV) I am amazed at how many Christians refuse to acknowledge this fact as it relates to the government school system. Our education is either based on biblical truth, or some other truth. There is no such thing as neutrality in this regard. All education is religious in nature. Since it is illegal for students in our government schools to be taught from a Christian perspective, then it follows that they must be taught from a non (or anti) Christian perspective.

As Hodge pointed out, the result of non-Christian education is anti-Christian education. Government schools must be anti-Christian. They can be nothing else. Therefore, to send a child to a government school is to have them trained in an anti-Christian environment for 14,000 instructional hours. To get that much instruction from church a child would have to attend two hours a week for one hundred and forty years!

1. THE BIBLE COMMANDS CHRIST-CENTERED EDUCATION

“This whole process of education is to be religious, and not only religious, but Christian…. And as Christianity is the only true religion, and God in Christ the only true God, the only possible means of profitable education is the nurture and admonition of the Lord.” - Charles Hodge
I recognize that educational antinomianism is the norm in the modern American church. According to the common refrain, “It doesn’t matter what educational choice you make... you just have to pray about it and do what the Lord leads your family to do.” However, I must confess I find this this concept disturbing on a number of fronts. First, this kind of thinking denies the sufficiency of Scripture. The Bible speaks either directly, or principially to every aspect of life. There are no grey areas. Sure, there are things that are difficult to discern, but education is not one of them. Though you won’t find the word ‘education’ in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, there are a number of passages that speak directly to the issue of training ourselves and our children intellectually, spiritually, philosophically and morally (See Deut. 6:6,7; Prov. 1:7; Eph. 6:4, etc). We also have numerous warnings against allowing others to influence us intellectually, spiritually, philosophically, and morally (Psalm 1; Rom. 12:1,2; 2 Cor. 6:14ff; Col. 2:8, etc.).

Second, this line of reasoning smacks of mysticism. Instead of making an argument with an open Bible we dismiss all opposition with the flippant, trite, overused, and theologically problem-laden phrase, “we prayed about it and this is what the Lord told us to do.” The lord ‘has spoken’. (Heb. 1:1-2) We are not awaiting new revelation. Instead of doing what the Lord ‘told us’, Christians are commanded to do what the Lord ‘has told us’ in his Word. The London Baptist Confession speaks to this matter rather poignantly:
The Holy Scripture is the only sufficient, certain, and infallible rule of all saving Knowledge, faith and obedience; Although the light of Nature, and the works of creation and providence do so far manifest the goodness, wisdom and power of God, as to leave men unexcusable [sic.]; yet are they not sufficient to give that knowledge of God and His will, which is necessary unto salvation. Therefore it pleased the Lord at sundry times, and in divers manners, to reveal himself, and to declare that His will unto his Church; and afterward for the better preserving, and propagating of the truth, and for the more sure establishment, and comfort of the Church against the corruption of the flesh, and the malice of Satan, and of the World, to commit the same wholly unto writing; which maketh the Holy Scriptures to be most necessary, those former ways of Gods revealing his will unto his people being now ceased.
The Cambridge Declaration states:
We reaffirm the inerrant Scripture to be the sole source of written divine revelation, which alone can bind the conscience. The Bible alone teaches all that is necessary for our salvation from sin and is the standard by which all Christian behavior must be measured. We deny that any creed, council or individual may bind a Christian's conscience, that the Holy Spirit speaks independently of or contrary to what is set forth in the Bible, or that personal spiritual experience [i.e., “the Lord told me”] can ever be a vehicle of revelation.
There’s enough here for an entire series of posts (so many posts... so little time), but for now let me simply say that the “the Lord told me” line of argumentation has serious theological problems. We must make our educational decisions with an open Bible. “The Lord told me” is no substitute for “the Bible says...” Please don’t make a decision about your child’s education without consulting (and obeying) the Scriptures.

This week the SBC hornet’s nest is being stirred up again over the education issue. The last time this happened I was beyond embarrassed as I listened to my esteemed colleagues make illogical, unscriptural, cowardly arguments for “not giving up on ‘our’ schools.” How I long for voices like Hodge, Van Til, and Machen (who called government education a “soul-killing system”) to be heard among my brethren. However, with over eighty-five percent of our children in the government schools and more government school teachers and administrators than any other “denomination”, it is highly unlikely that our side will prevail on this issue any time soon. One wonders what the schools will have to do to our children before we are willing to acknowledge the folly of our choices. In the meantime, I will continue to watch, fight, and pray, and try to convince as many of you as I can to liberate your children from Caesar’s indoctrination camps.

I have quoted John Wesley on this issue in previous posts. However, his words are far too pertinent for me to ignore on this issue:
“Let it be remembered, that I do not speak to the wild, giddy, thoughtless world, but to those that fear God. I ask, then, for what end do you send you children to school? “Why, that they may be fit to live in the world.” In which world do you mean, — this or the next? Perhaps you thought of this world only; and had forgot that there is a world to come; yea, and one that will last for ever! Pray take this into your account, and send them to such masters as will keep it always before their eyes. Otherwise, to send them to school (permit me to speak plainly) is little better than sending them to the devil. At all events, then, send your boys, if you have any concern for their souls, not to any of the large public schools, (for they are nurseries of all manner of wickedness,) but private school, kept by some pious man, who endeavours to instruct a small number of children in religion and learning together.”
I can’t help but wonder if people called Wesley divisive or extremist for making the aforementioned comments. Perhaps not. Perhaps they simply said, “That may be right for you, but it’s not what the Lord told us to do.”

VB
Click here for the original post

Obama Refuses to Pledge to Keep Family on Public Health Plan if They Become Sick

Of course not... he and his family deserve better than the rest of us!

Warren Buffett: U.S. Economy In ‘Shambles’

Sanford Admits Affair UPDATE: Full Press Conference Video Added

A sad sad story.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford says he's been having an affair with a woman from Argentina and will resign as head of the Republican Governors' Association.
The married father of four emotionally apologized to his wife, staff and others at a news conference after returning Wednesday from a trip to Argentina that followed a dayslong absence. His staff had said the Republican was hiking on the Appalachian Trail.

Sanford says he met the woman about eight years ago and it became romantic about a year ago. He says his wife and family have known about it for the past five months.

He had been a rumored contender for the 2012 GOP ticket. He's most recently snared headlines for his unsuccessful fight to turn aside federal stimulus cash for his state's schools.
- Click here for the original story


Video:


Sanford Back in U.S. After Visit to Argentina

Hmmm... interesting.

ATLANTA | S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford arrived in the Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport this morning, having wrapped up a seven-day visit to Buenos Aires, Argentina, he said. Sanford said he had not been hiking along the Appalachian Trail, as his staff said in a Tuesday statement to the media.

Sanford's whereabouts had been unknown since Thursday, and the mystery surrounding his absence fueled speculation about where he had been and who's in charge in his absence. His emergence Wednesday ended the mystery.

Sanford, in an exclusive interview with The State, said he decided at the last minute to go to the South American country to recharge after a difficult legislative session in which he battled with lawmakers over how to spend federal stimulus money.

Sanford said he had considered hiking on the Appalachian Trail, an activity he said he has enjoyed since he was a high school student.

"But I said 'no' I wanted to do something exotic," Sanford said "... It's a great city."

Sanford, in a brief interview in the nation's busiest airport, said he has been to the city twice before, most recently about a year and half ago during a Commerce Department trip.

Sanford said he was alone on the trip. He declined to give any additional details about what he did other than to say he drove along the coastline.

Sanford, who was wearing a blue and white button down shirt and brown denim pants, said he left for Buenos Aires on Thursday night from Columbia Metropolitan Airport and had originally planned to come back tomorrow. "
- click here for the full article

UPDATE - Video Added

Federal Agent Spotted Governor Sanford Boarding Plane in Atlanta

Hmmm... a weird twist to the story. Guess we'll find out more tomorrow, perhaps?

Congressman: Boxer Out of Line with Comment to Brigadier General

Here's a follow-up to the story from the other day on Barbara Boxer.

"Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) knows Walsh personally and says addressing Boxer as "ma'am" was completely appropriate.

"He'd been out there toiling in 104-degree heat, serving America. And responding to people who address you with a respectful 'yes, sir' or 'yes, ma'am' is exactly what you're taught to do in military protocol," he notes. "When confronted with Senator Boxer admonishing him for addressing her as 'yes, ma'am' and directing him to address her as 'Senator,' the proper response would have been 'yes, ma'am!'"
- click here for the full article.

Sanford Hiking the Appalachian Trail?

Sounds like he just wanted to get away from the world for a few days. As for him needing to be accessible at all times... I don't necessarily agree with that. If there is an emergency, then the Lt Gov. can take over... otherwise he should be able to take a few days and get totally away from everything if he likes. Since when did the Gov become SOO important that our very lives depend on him every single day??

S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford’s staff said late Monday that the governor is hiking on the Appalachian Trail, ending four days during which staff and state officials said they had not heard from him.

Neither Sanford’s office nor the State Law Enforcement Division, which provides security for governors, had been able to reach Sanford since he left the mansion Thursday in a black Suburban SUV assigned to his security detail, said state Sen. Jake Knotts , R-Lexington, and three others familiar with the situation, but who declined to be identified.

Joel Sawyer, the governor’s spokesman would not disclose where on the trail the governor was hiking, nor would he reveal whether Sanford was hiking alone.

Sanford’s last known location was near Atlanta late last week. A mobile telephone tower there picked up a signal from his phone, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Since then, the governor’s state and personal phones had been turned off, and Sanford had not responded to phone or text messages, a source said. Most mobile phones cannot be tracked if they are turned off.

First lady Jenny Sanford said Monday her husband has been gone for several days over Father’s Day weekend and she did not know where.

She said she was not concerned.

“He was writing something and wanted some space to get away from the kids,” Jenny Sanford told The Associated Press while vacationing with the couple’s four sons at their Sullivan’s Island beach house.
- Click here for the full story

World Bank Forecasts Weaker Economy and Obama Expects 10%+ Unemployment!

"The Dow Jones industrials ($INDU) suffered their fifth loss in the last six sessions, and the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) fell back into the red for all of 2009.

The Dow fell 201 points, or 2.4%, to 8,339. The S&P 500 was off 28 points, or 3.1%, to 893, and the Nasdaq Composite Index ($COMPX) dropped 61 points, or 3.4% to 1,766.

The losses were the largest for the major indexes in point and percentage terms since April 20.

Trading volume, however, was light for much of the day but seemed to accelerate in the last half-hour of trading.

The sell-off was prompted by a forecast from the World Bank that said the global economy will contract by 2.9% this year, a deeper contraction than the 1.7% decline the bank had forecast in March.

The bank also said developing countries will only grow by 1.9% this year, a big drop from the 5.9% growth seen in 2008 and the 8.1% growth in 2007.

In the last hour of trading, the Obama administration conceded that the national unemployment rate will top 10% "within the next few months" and sooner than expected, and losses appeared to accelerate."
- Click here to read the full article.

As a follow-up to that... here's a clip from Hannity the other day. I know nobody likes to think about these types of things, but if you are prudent you will at least give it some thought.

Hannity features "Urban Survivalists"

Governor Sanford Not Far From Atlanta?

Obama's Doctor Knocks ObamaCare

And then espouses a socialist healthcare plan that he wants Obama to put into place. It's amazing the total ignorance of these people.

And as an aside, this is the type of person Obama has been around for the past 20+ years... so what are they telling him? "Implement socialism!"
David Scheiner, an internist based in the Chicago neighborhood of Hyde Park, has a diverse practice of lower-income adults from the nearby housing projects mixed with famous patients like U.S. Sen. Carol Mosely Braun, the late writer Studs Terkel and, most notably, President Barack Obama.

Scheiner, 71, was Obama's doctor from 1987 until he entered the White House; he vouched for the then-candidate's "excellent health" in a letter last year. He's still an enthusiastic Obama supporter, but he worries about whether the health care legislation currently making its way through Congress will actually do any good, particularly for doctors like himself who practice general medicine. "I'm not sure he really understands what we face in primary care," Scheiner says.
What should the president be focused on? Scheiner thinks that a good health reform would be "Medicare for all," a single-payer system where the government would cover everyone and pay for it by cutting out waste in the system. "A neurosurgeon gets paid $20,000 for cutting into the neck of my patient. Have him get paid $1 million a year instead of $2 million or $3 million. He won't starve," Scheiner says.
- Click here for the full article from Forbes.com

Congresswoman Will Not Complete Census Questionnaire

Nice to see some courage out there... now maybe the men will follow her lead and have some courage as well to stand up to unconstitutional intrusion into our lives.



"I know for my family the only question that we will be answering is how many people is in our home. We won't be answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that." - Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann

Navy Destroyer Moves to Intercept North Korean Weapons Ship

Interesting stuff happening out there....


Reference story

‘Mrs. Boxer’ Chides Brigadier General Walsh for Calling Her “Ma’am”

Though I'm not sure why she would object to a Brigadier General showing respect for her as a woman by saying "ma'am". It's so childish! It'd be like me telling her not to call me "sir".

Canadian Mother Fights Off Cougar to Save 3 Year Old Daughter

Bush: 'Government Does Not Create Wealth'



Did W Slam O? Read the Washington Times article to see what you think.

Democrats Call for Surprise Vote on Spending Bill

So much for open debate...

Update: Cop Arrests EMT In Route to Hospital

Here's an update to an earlier post about a cop on a power trip arresting an EMT for a traffic violation in route to the hospital. Here's the video from the cop car, with more detail.

Invest for the Future: AR Style

Or AK style, whichever investment vehicle you prefer to have in your portfolio.

Btw… this investment tip was sent to me by my Mother, so I have to believe it's a good buy, you can never go wrong listening to your mom! :)

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Money Shot
thedailyshow.com

Quote of the Day

"The foundation of national morality must be laid in private families. ... How is it possible that Children can have any just Sense of the sacred Obligations of Morality or Religion if, from their earliest Infancy, they learn their Mothers live in habitual Infidelity to their fathers, and their fathers in as constant Infidelity to their Mothers?" --John Adams

Michael Moore: 'Save Our CEOs'

LOL... no doubt his movie will blast "greedy" Capitalism for the economic woes... but his trailer is funny and truthful.

Ben Stein on Obama Czars

Obama Considering Bulldozing US Cities in Order to Survive

Wow! Interesting "approach" to dealing with the recession.

Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic "shrink to survive" proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline.

The government looking at expanding a pioneering scheme in Flint, one of the poorest US cities, which involves razing entire districts and returning the land to nature.

Local politicians believe the city must contract by as much as 40 per cent, concentrating the dwindling population and local services into a more viable area.

The radical experiment is the brainchild of Dan Kildee, treasurer of Genesee County, which includes Flint.

Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.

Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes.

Most are former industrial cities in the "rust belt" of America's Mid-West and North East. They include Detroit, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Memphis.

In Detroit, shattered by the woes of the US car industry, there are already plans to split it into a collection of small urban centres separated from each other by countryside.

"The real question is not whether these cities shrink – we're all shrinking – but whether we let it happen in a destructive or sustainable way," said Mr Kildee. "Decline is a fact of life in Flint. Resisting it is like resisting gravity."

Karina Pallagst, director of the Shrinking Cities in a Global Perspective programme at the University of California, Berkeley, said there was "both a cultural and political taboo" about admitting decline in America.

"Places like Flint have hit rock bottom. They're at the point where it's better to start knocking a lot of buildings down," she said.
- click here for the rest of the article.

Incredible Congressional Testimony from Chrysler/GM Dealership Owner

This is well worth listening to the whole way through. Mr Blankenbeckler, owner of the oldest Chevrolet dealership in Texas, lays it all out there for Congress, and makes some GREAT points about the whole situation. It truly is sad to see this happening in America.



"My grandfather paid for Carlisle Chevrolet from his labors. My father paid my grandmother for Carlisle Chevrolet through his efforts. It took me nearly 20 years to pay my parents for Carlisle Chevrolet. It took GM and Chrysler a mere 24 hours to take Carlisle Chevrolet from me."

Obamacare: It's Not About Choice

It's all about lies and deceit from Obama, trying to lull the population into yet another government takeover of another private industry. This is serious stuff folks, time to get a movin' and contact your Congressmen and Senators.

It's obvious that the people behind Obama are not trying to cover up what their goals are - they are socialists and proud of it! It's time we stop allowing the media to not report the full story... and not challenge incorrect and false statements by Obama.

"The Public Plan Deception - It's Not About Choice"

Ooops!!

He's gotten an "apology"?? Wow! That's big of them.

Georgia Contractor Using GPS Coordinates, Not Street Address, Demolishes Wrong House

Democrat Congressman Admits 'Compensation Czar' Equals Socialism

Wow... a Democrat actually championing "capitalism". Weird. :)



Related: Barney Frank Walks Off Live CNBC Interview on Executive Compensation

Barney Frank on Obama's Executive Compensation Cap Plan

Taking the Games Away from England

LOL...

Barney Frank Walks Off Live CNBC Interview on Executive Compensation

Can't take the heat eh?



Here's the full interview -

Barney Frank on Obama's Executive Compensation Cap Plan

And according to him it doesn’t go far enough! So Obama isn’t taking as much freedom and liberty away from the American people as Congressman Barney Frank wants. Nice!

NY Democrats Cut Lights and Mics in Senate to Prevent GOP Takeover

LOL... if you haven't seen this story yet, it's pretty good. The democrats couldn't take the "heat" so what do they do in situations like this? Cut the lights and mics, just like they did in Washington a year or so ago.

Cop Tasers 72 Yr Old Great-Grandmother

This is the kind of stuff that makes me wonder how our police officers are being trained - it seems to me that they have begun using the taser as their first reaction instead of as a last resort. I mean good grief! Yeah this lady was being "defiant"... but it's not like she ever posed a real threat to the officer! I mean come on... is this officer saying that he couldn't handle an old lady without the use of a taser? Get real! If he needed to control her, he could have done that very quickly, and safely, without the use of a weapon.


The full video below shows more detail, but the Sgt defending the officer, in my opinion, doesn't make that great of an argument. Yes the baton would have "broken something", but why would he need to use a baton on a 72 year old lady anyways? Wouldn't just using a little physical force to get her turned around, against the car, and handcuffed have worked? Why in the world do you have to use a taser??

Click here to watch the full length video with more details.

Rubert Murdoch: Unemployment Will Hit 11%

"I think he sees himself as a president of change and that involves bigger government. He’s made no secret of that and I think it’s dangerous.”

Obama's Teleprompter

I guess MSNBC is trying to change their image of going easy on Obama, and this is what they consider "critical reporting". :)

It Ain't Over Till Obama Says So...

The recession that is... and by the way, it will take "considerable time" before we do recover. I don't seem to remember this kind of talk during the campaign? I thought everything was going to be rosie and bright if he was elected, wasn't hope and change going to ride in on a white horse and save the day???

Microsoft to Move Employees Offshore if Obama Increases Taxes

Thanks Obama! How would these lost jobs calculate in your "saving or creating 3 million jobs"?

June 3 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp. Chief Executive Officer Steven Ballmer said the world’s largest software company would move some employees offshore if Congress enacts President Barack Obama’s plans to impose higher taxes on U.S. companies’ foreign profits.

“It makes U.S. jobs more expensive,” Ballmer said in an interview. “We’re better off taking lots of people and moving them out of the U.S. as opposed to keeping them inside the U.S.”

Obama on May 4 proposed outlawing or restricting about $190 billion in tax breaks for offshore companies over the next decade. Such business groups as the National Foreign Trade Council, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable have denounced the proposed overhaul.

U.S. tax rules let companies defer paying corporate rates as high as 35 percent on most types of foreign profits as long as that money remains invested overseas. Obama says he wants to end such incentives to keep foreign profits tax-deferred so that companies would invest them in the U.S.

Microsoft reported an overall effective tax rate of 26 percent for 2008 in its last annual report. “Our effective tax rates are less than the statutory tax rate due to foreign earnings taxed at lower rates,” the report said.

Barry Bosworth, an economist in Washington at the Brookings Institution research center, said many software companies such as Microsoft have exploited tax and trade rules in the U.S. and other countries to achieve a low overall tax rate.

Ireland Subsidiary

Typically, he said, a company like Microsoft develops a product like Windows in the United States and deducts those costs against U.S. income. It then transfers the technology to a subsidiary in Ireland, where corporate tax rates are lower, without charging licensing fees. The company then assigns its foreign sales to the Irish subsidiary so it doesn’t have to claim the income in the United States.

“What Microsoft wants to do is deduct the cost at a high tax rate and report the profits at a low tax rate,” Bosworth said. “Relative to where they are now, the administration’s proposals are less favorable, so there will be some rebalancing on their part.”

Ballmer is one of 10 U.S. software company executives pushing back against the tax proposals in meetings today with White House officials including Jason Furman, deputy director of the National Economic Council, and the heads of congressional committees such as House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat.

Expense Deductions

Among other things, Obama proposed limiting expense deductions such as those for employee compensation when companies defer U.S. tax on foreign profits.

In a roundtable discussion today, Ballmer, Symantec Corp. Chairman John Thompson and the heads of smaller companies such as privately held Bentley Systems, an Exton, Pennsylvania-based maker of engineering software, said such policies would hurt domestic investment, reduce shareholder value and increase the cost of employing U.S. workers.

Ballmer said that, while the Obama proposals would preserve expense deductions related to research and experimentation costs, the overall deduction limits for companies that defer tax on foreign profits would raise the cost of employing U.S. workers. Fiduciary responsibility to shareholders would require Microsoft to cut costs, he said, meaning many jobs would be moved out of the country.

Worldwide Employees

Microsoft employed 95,029 people worldwide as of April 21, of whom 56,552 were based in the United States, according to the company’s Web site. The company announced it was firing up to 5,000 people in January while hiring some new workers; the company has shed about 1,000 jobs since then, spokesman Lou Gellos said.

Ballmer estimated that higher taxes under the proposal would reduce profits for companies that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average by between 10 and 15 percentage points.

“It’s just a question of how much will the Dow come down,” Ballmer said. “It’s not about companies anyway; we’re talking about shareholders.”

In addition to limiting current deductions for companies that defer U.S. tax on their foreign profits, Obama proposed altering a set of rules known as “check the box” that allow companies to shelter foreign profits in offshore subsidiaries that can be disregarded for U.S. tax purposes.
- Click here for the rest of the article.

Schwarzenegger Suggests CA Consider Flat Tax

What??? The "Governator" is suggesting something that makes sense? Amazing!

Could the flat tax come to California?

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said today that he would like to see such “radical” proposals come out of a commission now studying an overhaul of the state’s tax system. The governor told the editorial board of the Sacramento Bee that he hoped the commission would not be afraid to propose something like “a 15% straight tax.”

“That’s the kind of radical, daring kind of a proposal that I want to see on the table so we can look at it and say, ‘Oh, let’s study this, maybe that is the way to go,’ ” Schwarzenegger said during the discussion, which was webcast.

The current system, based on highly unstable income tax revenue that fluctuates with the economy, “doesn’t work,” Schwarzenegger said.

Advocates of a flat tax, which applies a single tax rate to all income, say it increases compliance with the tax codes because it is so simple and easy to understand. But opponents dislike that it taxes the wealthy at the same rates as the poor.

Steve Forbes and Jerry Brown both pushed for it during their presidential campaigns.

Schwarzenegger said he was concerned that the commission might be too timid in what it suggests and rule things out in advance thinking that either Democrats or Republicans would object.

“I hope and I pray that they don’t think they have to make a political decision,” he said.

-- Michael Rothfeld in Sacramento
- Click here for the original article

KY Pastor Asks Congregation to Bring Guns to Church to Celebrate 4th of July

It's a shame that the State of Georgia has decided to unconstitutionally ban guns in places of worship – otherwise I would suggest this to my pastor :)

Pelosi: Health Care Bill Will Pass House by End of July, "For Sure"

Reason # 341,124,512,432 Why I Educate My Children at Home

Two reaons in one article! :)

6th-grader takes loaded gun to school in Penn Hills, High school student who wouldn't stop using cell phone Tasered
Thursday, June 04, 2009
By Eleanor Chute, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A loaded 9mm weapon was confiscated from a sixth-grader at Linton Middle School in Penn Hills today.

And in a second incident, a Penn Hills police officer used a stun gun on a high school student who refused to stop talking on a cell phone and pushed the officer.

At the middle school, a 9mm semi-automatic handgun was found in the swim bag of an 11-year-old girl at the metal detectors this morning.

Penn Hills police Chief Howard Burton said the gun was fully loaded but there was not a bullet in the chamber.

He said the girl had brought her swim bag still containing wet swim clothes from the previous day and said she did not know how the gun got into the bag. The gun turned out to have been reported to state police as stolen from Uniontown.

"At this point in the investigation, we don't believe she knew the gun was in there. She had the bag yesterday swimming, locked it in her locker after swim class, went home last night, threw it in her bedroom, grabbed the bag and went to school," Chief Burton said.

He said she has been removed from school.

At Penn Hills High School this morning, Chief Burton said, a student was walking up and down a hallway, using a cell phone. School policy permits students to have cell phones but not to use them during school except in emergencies, Chief Burton said.

A Penn Hills police officer told him to put the phone away and go to class.

"The kid refused to listen," Chief Burton said. "The officer took him by the arm and said, 'You have to go to the office.' The student resisted, pushed the officer. The officer, defending himself, took out his stun gun and did a drive stun."

Chief Burton said a drive stun involves pushing the Taser against a portion of the body and squeezing the trigger, thus immobilizing a portion of the body, such as the leg. He said this affects about a 2- or 3-inch area.

While on the floor, the student was still resisting and was placed in handcuffs, Chief Burton said. The student complained of a headache and dizziness and was taken to Forbes Regional Hospital.
- click here for the original article

Chinese Officers Block CNN Camera at Tiananmen Square in Wake of Anniversary

Got to love the Chi-Coms "taking care of business"

Rush on Powell and Sotomayor

Chavez says "Comrade" Obama More Socialist than Castro and Himself!

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez said on Tuesday that he and Cuban ally Fidel Castro risk being more conservative than U.S. President Barack Obama as Washington prepares to take control of General Motors Corp.
During one of Chavez's customary lectures on the "curse" of capitalism and the bonanzas of socialism, the Venezuelan leader made reference to GM's bankruptcy filing, which is expected to give the U.S. government a 60 percent stake in the 100-year-old former symbol of American might.

"Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right," Chavez joked on a live television broadcast.

During a decade in government, Chavez has nationalized most of Venezuela's key economic sectors, including multibillion dollar oil projects, often via joint ventures with the private sector that give the state a 60 percent controlling stake.
- Click here for the full article.

Rush on Hannity: 'I Still Want Obama to Fail'

Robber Begs for Mercy and Promises to Join Islam

The Meaning of Freedom in 1948

A little education on America, for those of you who were publically educated, after 1948 ;)